On-Chain Governance

Governance enables token holders and validators to propose parameter changes, add modules, or allocate treasury funds through transparent, time-bound on-chain voting.

Proposals are submitted publicly, debated in the open, and automatically executed if they meet quorum and approval thresholds.

Mechanism
What It Enables

On-Chain Proposals

Anyone can submit proposals to update parameters, allocate treasury funds, or introduce new modules.

Time-Boxed Voting

Voting periods are fixed and transparent, preventing delays or manipulation.

Quorum & Threshold Rules

Proposals only pass if they meet pre-defined participation and approval thresholds — ensuring legitimacy.

Automatic Execution

Successful proposals are executed trustlessly, without manual intervention.

Validator & Token Holder Participation

Both validators and community members have a say in protocol direction.

Governance Mechanics in Lylo

  1. Network Evolution Without Central Control Governance allows the protocol to evolve — updating parameters, adding modules, or upgrading logic — without requiring decisions from a centralized team.

  2. Community-Led Product Development Token holders can shape Lylo’s roadmap by proposing new AI features, cross-chain integrations, or UX improvements that reflect real user demand.

  3. Trust Through Transparency Every step of the governance process — proposal, debate, vote, execution — is recorded on-chain and open to all, reinforcing accountability and trust.

Last updated